Saturday, January 24, 2015

It's the End of the World...Again

No matter how many times people have predicted the End of the World, only to have those prophecies go unfulfilled, there will always be someone else coming along to do it again and there will always be people gullible enough to believe them.

If you had hoped that End of the World predictions would have stopped after nothing came of the 2012 doomsayers, you hoped in vain. There have been numerous people who predicted the Second Coming of Jesus Christ and all of then have been proven wrong. There are still yet other individuals who claim to know when Jesus will return, but don't hold your breath.

Sadly, when predictions like these come down the pike, there will be people who believe them wholeheartedly. People have given away all their possessions in anticipation of Jesus' return and other people who have actually killed themselves out of fear of the coming Apocalypse.

So, people have suffered financial ruin, psychological trauma and even death because of self-appointed prophets.

Enter Gabriel Ansley, who (like so many others) claims to know with absolute certainty, when Jesus will return. He has authored a book and produced a video, which you can see below.

How to Tell Time

The open claim of this film is that Jesus will return during the 2000th year after his crucifixion, which 2028End gives as the year 28AD, so Jesus is supposedly returning in the year 2028AD,

The video gives  examples of various events in Biblical history and claims that each of these events was prophesied during the Genesis Creation account and further links these events to Jesus' life and death. While they are rather creative interpretations, most of them aren't anything new. If you've heard enough Evangelical preachers' sermons, you've heard these examples before.

The biggest problem with this film is that it uses the wrong calendar.

The premise of the film is that Jesus' Second Coming will take place on the 2000th anniversary of his death, which will coincide with the 6000th year since the Creation of the Universe as told in the Genesis account. But, they're using the wrong dating system and they are off by over 200 years!

The only calendar mentioned in the Jewish Bible (a.k.a. the Old Testament) is the Hebrew calendar and it alone is the guide for the Jews to tell them when their holy days occur. Passover doesn't happen in the month of May or April, it happens on the 15th day of the Jewish month of Nisan. The Hebrew calendar is the same calendar that Jesus himself used, not the Julian calendar which the Romans used and certainly not the Gregorian calendar we use today. The people behind 2028 End are claiming that from Day One of Creation, Jesus's Second Coming will occur 6000 Gregorian calendar years later and this is just plain laughable.

Today's date (the day I am posting this blog entry) is January 24, 2015.

But, according to the Hebrew calendar, today's date is the 4th of Sh'vat, 5775. The Hebrew calendar years are counted from Day One of Creation. So, this year is the 5775th year since God created the Universe. So, we have another 225 years until the 6000th year of the Hebrew calendar.

So, if we want to find out what the Gregorian year will be on the First Day of Passover (15th day of Nisan) in the Hebrew calendar year 6000, we simply put it through this handy-dandy converter and we get April 7, 2240.

I posted a comment on Gabriel's video, explaining all this and here is his response:
The Hebrew calendar's year count is wrong ... google "missing years in jewish calendar"
Furthermore, I have given ample Biblical evidence proving God prophesied in His Word the Messiah, Christ Jesus, would be dying on the cross during Earth's 4,000 solar year of existence. No calendar is needed to understand this truth.  It's a simple fact that when Earth was making its 4,000 trip around the sun, counted from Creation, Jesus Christ was dying on the cross.
Once this truth is understood, THEN, one can go to a calendar and decide when 2,000 solar years will be after Jesus' death.  On that note, our Gregorian calendar is fine ... Christ died around AD 28, and thus year 6,000 will be around year AD 2028.  
While the Hebrew calendar certainly has its problems, no calendar system is perfect. Even the Gregorian calendar has issues. After all, the Earth doesn't circle the Sun in exactly 365 24-hour days. It's a little off and we've known this for a long time. But, Gabe seems to prefer to stick with the Gregorian calendar because the Hebrew calendar doesn't tell him what he wants to hear, while he can make the Gregorian one fit into his preconceived ideas. He says bases his claim that the date of 28AD when Jesus was supposed to have died upon an article written for the website Biblical Theology. However, even that article has problems, regardless of what Gabriel thinks. The author claims that Herod the Great died in the year 1BC and not 4BC as most scholars claim. However, Herod's own sons dated the start of their respective reigns from 4BC, so their father was already dead by then. While Gabriel may wish to believe what Pallant Ramsundar says, he's not basing his beliefs on the writings of a Biblical scholar. here's what Virginia State University says about him:
Dr. Pallant Ramsundar – A research professor who earned his Ph.D. in Rapid Manufacturing from the University of Cambridge in England.  Dr. Ramsundar’s research interests include product design and development, flexible manufacturing solutions, manufacturing automation and real time production control and management.
Whatever Gabriel thinks about Dr Ramsundar's paper, the claim of 28AD being the actual year of Jesus' death has not found acceptance in scholarly circles.

An additional claim made in the movie is that God established the 7-day week and that humanity "unknowingly celebrates it every 7-day week". 

While the 7-day week is in worldwide usage, that has more to do with the spread of Judaism, Christianity and Islam over the centuries, rather than any sort of default programming hidden in the human brain. The Ancient Romans used an eight-day week until the fourth century CE, when it was supplanted with the seven day week. China, Japan, Korea and Ancient Egypt used a ten-day week. You can find more examples at this link.

The Ancient Babylonians used a seven-day week and the ancient Hebrews originated from that part of the world. While not perfect, a better system couldn't be easily developed or adopted.

A Little Bit of Crazy, Mixed With Ignorance

Gabriel Ansley doesn't just rely on his dating system or his interpretations of the Bible. He's got direct evidence from God for this bit of insanity.

Several times on his website, he mentions "signs" that he and others have received from Yahweh to confirm that he's on the right track.

Add to that his attacks on the Theory of Evolution, which is the foundation of modern biology and confirmed across numerous scientific disciplines, Gabriel is a literal Young Earth Creationist for whom science is a dirty word. For Mr Ansley and people like him, science is bad...unless it's doing stuff like curing diseases, taking pictures of distant galaxies, building computers, helping us grow enough food to feed ourselves and keeping our water clean.

Not being one to judge others, he uses videos made by convicted criminal Kent Hovind. I guess Hovind's numerous convictions for federal crimes wasn't enough to convince Mr Ansley that Kent is an unreliable source.

As with Dr Ramsundar, Mr Ansley is basing his beliefs upon the words of people without sufficient educational background in the field they are writing about. Kent Hovind is often referred to as "Dr Kent Hovind", but he has no doctorate in science or anything else from an accredited university. But, because he tells people what they want to hear, their statements are taken as true.

Seriously, I weep for my country when science-unfriendly people like Gabriel Ansley are given more credibility than people who have spent decades of their lives in the search for scientific Truth.

"Thou Shalt Not Steal"

I noticed right away that the video contains a portion of the 1966 film "The Bible: In the Beginning..." in which Jon Huston plays the character of Noah. The relevant portion can be found starting at about 9 minutes 30 seconds. The movie is the intellectual property of 20th Century Fox and I don't know if the video uploader received their permission to do this. If not, this video could be taken down from YouTube if 20th Century Fox were to file a DMCA complaint.

Further into the movie, what appears to be a scene from the 2014 film "Exodus: Gods and Kings" plays starting at 25 minutes, 50 seconds. Again, this is a film owned by 20th Century Fox.

There are clips from other movies used throughout the video, though all are altered so that the images aren't as clear as in the original films. But, these are scenes from motion pictures which are all the intellectual property of others and, as far as I am aware, the person who posted this video did not receive the films' owners' permission to use them. The usage of these clips probably would not even be covered under Fair Use.

Even if we assume that the person who uploaded the video is sincere and only has good intentions in his heart, that does not make it permissible to use someone else's intellectual property without their permission or even giving them credit.

Deja Vu All Over Again

After Harold Camping predicted (inaccurately, of course) the Rapture to occur in May 2011, his radio network and many of his followers spent large amounts of their own money to advertise the coming apocalypse. Advertising campaigns were carried out in countries all over the world and advertisements appeared on billboards, park benches and various other media.

Imagine my absolute disgust when I discovered that Gabriel Ansley wants people to do the same thing for him. He not only wants people to buy ad space in the media, but also to place ads on park benches, bus stops, aerial banners, etc and he's even looking for someone to turn his message into a movie!

Gabriel Ansley, Profit of Doom?

It's entirely possible that Gabe is totally sincere. He may actually believe this load of shit that he's shoveling. But, I have to admit that I'm also wondering if Mr Ansley might be looking at the Bottom Line.

After all, he's selling his book and other items on his website. He could have made his entire book available for free download and printing, but he didn't. While I admit that running his several websites costs money, he does have a pretty good chance of selling a lot of books of he manages to get enough free advertisements from committed believers. At $12.95 a pop, that could add-up pretty fast and he's got over two million views on his video already.

A good way to make an apocalyptic prediction is to place the event far enough in the future so that you have enough time to get your message out. In the interval between today and The End of the World, there's plenty of time to sell books, collect donations and maybe get paid speaking fees by people who want to know if they should get ready for the End of Days.

There's also plenty of time for people to visit his YouTube channel to discover his music videos. Gabriel is also an aspiring Country Music singer and I doubt if he'd turn down a recording contract if someone offered it to him before Jesus gets back. As it is, he still has 13 years to get rich and famous before the Second Coming. No sense devoting yourself entirely to doom-saying if/when Nashville beckons.

I Hate Gabriel Ansley and Everyone Like Him

The one thing that turns my stomach to the verge of projectile vomiting when I see people like Gabriel is that after they've sold all the books, collected donations from their followers and gotten people scared perhaps to the point of suicide, is that when The Big Day finally arrives and their predictions have again been proven false, they never give back the money they've made. Ever. They never even talk about it.

A simple "I guess I was wrong" has to suffice for all the people who bought books and donated their hard-earned money to these charlatans, only to realize that it was all for nothing. Afterward, the  now-former doomsayers can just count their money and laugh all the way to the bank. I wish a slow death in abject poverty on all the people who sold their books predicting the 2012 Apocalypse and got rich, while frightened people cowered in fear around the world. Not a single one of these 2012 profiteers expressed any sort of sorrow when Isabel Taylor committed suicide out of fear of the predicted doomsday.

And Now A Word From Jesus
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. 
(Gospel of Matthew chapter 7, verses 15 to 20)

My Prediction for 2028

When Jesus hasn't arrived by the date Gabriel is giving us, I'm going to go get some food to celebrate his non-arrival. Maybe some chicken curry. Yeah, that sounds good. Spicy hot chicken curry, a side order of deep-friend spring rolls with plum sauce for dipping and either a Pepsi or Thai iced coffee to wash it down.

That's going to be my Doomsday Dinner.



Duane Browning


Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Calling Out Efraim Inbar's Bullshit

Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University, and a Shillman/Ginsburg fellow at the Middle East Forum recently published an article titled "Turkey is no American Ally", which was originally titled, "America's Unacknowledged Problem." and I take issue with a number of statements Mr Inbar made. I will quote directly from the article itself:
But Erdogan-led Turkey does not behave as an ally or a friend of the US. This is not a new development.
If he means that Turkey hasn't always marched in lock-step with American wishes, he may be correct here. However, Turkey is a sovereign country, with its own interests, concerns and goals. The Turkish government is obligated to look after Turkish interests first. Its allies' concerns must come secondary.

For example, Turkey shares a common border with Iran and it's in Turkey's best interest to keep relations as friendly as possible, considering how much trade they do with each other. Iran is one of Turkey's largest trading partners and Turkey receives a considerable percentage of their natural gas from them. Yet, the USA expected Turkey to simply jump on-board  with a new round of sanctions against Iran and when Turkey hesitated, the USA held up military aid that Turkey needed in their fight against the PKK terrorists.

Okay, the US is concerned about Iran's nuclear program. But, Iran hasn't made any attempt to strike either the US or Israel militarily and such attempts would be noticed long before they came to fruition, assuming that they'd even be crazy enough to try. But, the PKK insurgency was a daily problem in Turkey which has cost thousands of lives. So, Turkey needed those weapons a lot more than the US needed to further turn the screws on Iran.

Besides, I've never heard of Turkey attacking US Navy ships or conducting espionage operations against the United States, both of which Israel has done.
Erdogan and his Islamist party, the AKP, have ruled Turkey since 2002. Erdogan's Turkey has gradually distanced itself from the West, adopting domestic and foreign policies fueled by Ottoman and Islamist impulses.
I think what is actually happening here is that Turkey has reevaluated its political position in its part of the world. The USA maintains close political and economic ties with its neighbors, Canada and Mexico. But, Turkey's only friends in its own region had long been primarily Azerbaijan and Israel. That's two countries out of all the countries in their neighborhood. Not much, when you think about it. Having a powerful military, a relatively stable government and a surging economy all at the same time, it was not in Turkey's best interest to have little, if any, influence with its neighbors, especially considering much of that part of the world was once under the Ottoman Empire's domain and therefore has historical significance to the Turkish people. We also cannot ignore the simple fact that 98% of the Turkish population is Muslim and the Turkish people have a strong affinity for their coreligionists, such as in Lebanon and the Palestinians.

For too long, Turkey has been obediently silent on Middle East issues, deferring to US and Israeli interests, while alienating and antagonizing its Iranian and Arab neighbors. That isn't much of a trade-off.
Turkey has been on the road to an authoritarian regime for several years. Infringements on human rights have gradually increased. In truth, Turkey has never had a political system with checks and balances able to constrain attempts to consolidate power around one politician. In recent years, Erdogan has weakened further the few constitutional constraints against the 'Putinization' of the Turkish political system.
I've got news for you: Turkey hasn't exactly been a bastion of democracy, even before the AKP took power.
The military, once active in politics as the defender of the Kemalist secular tradition, has been successfully sidelined.
Like the coup the military carried out against the democratically-elected government of  Necmettin Erbakan? While Turkey's economy certainly improved after the coup, the coup itself resulted in thousands of people being arrested, tortured and killed. The coup leaders themselves were eventually arrested, tried, convicted and sentenced to prison. In fact, there was allegedly another planned coup in the works when the AKP won elections in 2003 and the Turkish government is currently cracking down on yet another military-linked organization's plans to overthrow the government.

I don't know how the Israeli people might feel if their own military decided on its own that they didn't agree with the election results one year and decided to step in and overthrow the government. But, I suspect that they wouldn't be very comfortable with their military doing something like that.

Essentially, Mister Inbar is saying that the Turkish military knows better than the Turkish people how to run a government.

Sorry, Efraim. Democracy is messy.
It pretends to cooperate with the US policy in the attempt to contain radical Islam, but actually Turkey supports ISIS. 
This is simply repeating claims made in Newsweek that Turkey gives actual military support to ISIS, but the reporters were unable to independently verify the claims made by their source. That did not stop other publications from taking the allegations as Gospel, as if an accusation equals proof. However, documented encounters between ISIS and Turkish forces have shown that the Turks have not hesitated to attack ISIS.

Prior to the Syria Civil War, relations between Syria and Turkey were actually warming-up, with Turkey offering to serve as mediator in 2009 for negotiations between Syria and Israel. While Syria was open to this, Israel flatly rejected the offer.
Turkey is also openly supporting another radical Islamist organization – Hamas. 
So does Qatar. Despite this, Israel has established trade relations with Qatar and the Qataris even assisted with the rescue of Jews fleeing Yemen.

Let's not forget that Hamas won elections in Gaza. So, they are the democratically elected government of the people living there. Israel might not like it, but there it is. If Turkey is trying to build bridges wit the Palestinian people, that means all of them, whether on the West Bank or in Gaza. While Hamas holds sway over Gaza, the Palestine National Authority does so in the West Bank and the Turks need to maintain ties with both parties to be effective diplomatically, especially since Hamas and the PNA are often opposing each other.
Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, has a rabid anti-American position.
You can find Hamas' charter at this link. There is no mention of the United States anywhere in it. Being anti-Israel does not make Hamas anti-American by default. Ahmed Yassin, the spiritual leader of Hamas at the time, strongly condemned the 9/11 attacks.
In 2003, Ankara denied the request from Washington to open its territory so that the US military could attack Saddam Hussein's forces from two separate fronts.
You mean for the war President George W Bush justified by saying, among other things, that Saddam was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction, which turned-out to be completely untrue? The war where Al-Qaida grew by leaps and bounds? The war which turned the entire country of Iraq into a war zone? That war?

Now, I wonder why Turkey didn't just want to leap right in and help us with that fiasco?

Seriously, though. Turkey was already in the middle of its own quagmire, fighting the PKK on its own soil. It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that a war in Iraq would turn into the same thing. If Turkey was going to start being a major diplomatic player in the Arab World again, it couldn't be seen as America's obedient lapdog, willing to let its master do as it wished, whenever it wished. So, rather than play the enabler for an obviously foolish endeavor, Turkey passed. In hindsight, it was a good plan.
AKP-ruled Ankara also defied American preferences on Syria, a country allied with radical Iran and on the American list of states supporting terrorism. In January 2004, Bashar Assad became the first Syrian president ever to visit Turkey. In April 2009, the two states conducted their first ever joint military exercise. No other NATO member had such close relations with the authoritarian regime in Damascus, which has been closely allied with Iran for several decades.
I think Mister Inbar needs to buy a recent map of the region. If he looked closely at Turkey, he'd notice that Syria and Turkey share a common border. In fact, the Syrian border is the longest foreign border Turkey has. It would seem to be a good idea to, at least, try to get along with your next door neighbor. Plus, since Syria is close friends with Iran and Iran also shares a border with Turkey, it makes even more sense. This isn't complicated stuff here, Efraim.
Turkey further deviated from the Western consensus in 2008 by hosting Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir twice. Bashir, who was charged with war crimes and genocide in Darfur, presided over an Islamist regime.
He was invited to Turkey in 2009 to attend a meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. As the sitting head of state of a Muslim majority country, he was entitled to attend. He later visited Denmark to attend conferences on climate change and Mr Inbar doesn't seem to have a problem with that.
Turkey even welcomed the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for a visit in August 2008. No Western country has issued such an invitation to the Iranian leader. Additionally, Erdogan congratulated Ahmadinejad immediately after his re-election in June 2009. When it comes to Iran's nuclear threat, Ankara, unlike its NATO allies, has refused to adopt the U.S. stance on harsher sanctions, fearing in part the economic consequences of such steps. In June 2010, Turkey voted at the UN Security Council against a US-sponsored resolution meant to impose a new round of sanctions on Iran.
Well, excuse Turkey for trying to stay on good terms with a neighboring country who happens to also one of its largest trading partner and the source of about 1/3 of its natural gas. Does Professor Inbar want Turkey to remain on outright hostile terms with countries with whom it shares a common border? I seem to remember Israel working very hard to establish peaceful relations with Jordan and Egypt. So, it's good enough for the Israelis, but not the Turks? Really?
Turkey also has consistently defied advice from Washington to tone down its anti-Israel statements and mend relations with an important American ally. All American efforts in this direction have failed.
Okay, I'll give you this one. But, the more important question is how important is Turkey's relationship with Israel, as opposed to the importance of Turkey's relations with the rest of the countries in the region, many of whom still don't like Israel very much. As I said, Turkey had offered to mediate negotiations between Israel and Syria, but Israel's rejection of the Turks' offer was undoubtedly quite an insult to the Turks who had made the offer in good faith and in the interests of peace. It looks like Turkey offered a helpful hand and Israel slapped it away.

Besides, Israel seems hellbent on starting a war with Iran, with Iran fighting Israel directly or fighting a US-led coalition. Either way, a war involving Iran would have even more disastrous effects than the Iraq War did. At the very least, you'd see Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and perhaps Pakistan dragged into it, with hundreds of thousands of refugees streaming across the borders, many of whom will end-up in Turkey. Who will feed and shelter these people? Israel? Doubtful. The United States? Given America's bungling of the disaster relief efforts after Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy, I doubt the USA could suddenly be able to competently handle a refugee crisis on the other side of the world. Israel can keep pushing for a war they want when they know they'll get off scot-free (aside from the occasional missile hit or bombing) but they wouldn't get stuck with the bill for the cost of the war they seem to want so much.

Of more concern to me is how the anti-Jewish rhetoric is spreading through Turkey, causing some Turkish Jews to emigrate to Israel or other countries. Jews have long been loyal, productive and contributory citizens of Turkey and it will be a sad day for both Jews and Turks if the Jewish community in Turkey fades into history as those of Libya and Egypt have and those of Lebanon are well on the way to the same fate.
There is also a clear divergence between the US and Turkey on important global issues such as Russia and China. For example, the US. wanted to send ships into the Black Sea via the Bosphorus Straits during the Georgia war in August 2008. Turkey flatly denied several such requests on the pretext that the military vessels were too large. Moreover, Turkey proposed the creation of a regional security framework involving Turkey, Russia, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, that left out a NATO role. More blatantly, Turkey has failed to participate in the Western economic sanctions imposed on Russia during the recent Ukraine crisis.
Yes, it certainly seems to be in Turkey's interests to piss-off the Russians, another major trading partner.(sarcasm) When the Republic of Turkey was founded, one of the first countries they signed a peace treaty with was the Soviet Union. Why? Because it was a big, powerful country that was pretty close-by. Well, the Soviets are gone, but the Russians are still around and Russia is still a big, powerful country that is still very close-by.

One of the biggest reasons for the decline of the Ottoman Empire was its loss in the Russo-Ottoman Wars, a lesson not lost to modern Turks. Yes, the USA is a powerful ally, but it's very far away. While a military conflict between Turkey and Russia is unlikely, a trade war is very possible. Since Armenia is a Russian ally, it behooves Russia to remain on friendly terms with the Turks. Plus, Azerbaijan is an ally of Turkey and it's a good idea to for Russia and Turkey to be friendly with each other so that they can work together in the future to resolve the Armenia-Azeri conflict, which in turn may finally lead to open diplomatic ties between the Armenians and the Turks, which have been stalemated for years.

Think long-term.
Dissonance exists also with regards to China. While the US fears the rise of China, Turkey sees this country as a potential economic partner and not as a problem. 
 China is a major trading partner with Turkey, right now! Most recent figures show that China is #15 on imported goods from Turkey and #2 (slightly behind Germany) on goods exported to them. By comparison, the USA is #9 on products from Turkey and #5 imports to Turkey.

Here's the rundown:

Exports from Turkey
1) Germany (9.2%)
2) Iraq (6.7%)
3) Iran (6.1%)
4) United Kingdom (5.4%)
5) United Arab Emirates (5.0%)
6) France (4.4%)
7) Russia (4.2%)
8) Italy (4.2%)
9) United States (3.8%)
10) Spain (2.5%)
11) Egypt (2.4%)
12) Belgium-Luxembourg (2.3%)
13) Saudi Arabia (2.2%)
14) Netherlands (1.9%)
15) China (1.9%)
16) Switzerland (1.6%)
17) Romania (1.5%)
18) Azerbaijan (1.4%)
19) Free Zones (1.4%)
20) Israel (1.3%)

Imports to Turkey:
1) Germany (11%)
2) China (9.9%)
3) Russia (7.3%)
4) Italy (6.6%)
5) United States (6.4%)
6) France (4.2%)
7) Spain (3.1%)
8) South Korea (2.7%)
9) India (2.7%)
10) United Kingdom (2.7%)
11) Switzerland (2.1%)
12) Belgium-Luxembourg (2.0%)
13) Netherlands (1.9%)
14) Ukraine (1.9%)
15) United Arab Emirates (1.8%)
16) Greece (1.7%)
17) Japan (1.7%)
18) Kazakhstan (1.6%)
19) Romania (1.6%)
20) Algeria  (1.6%)

By the way, if the USA is nervous about the rise of China, why does it do so much trade with them? On that vein, maybe Professor Inbar should ask his government why Israel does so much trade with China, too?
It held military exercises with China. Ankara even considered purchasing anti-aircraft systems from Beijing, an incredibly brazen position for a NATO member!
Israel has also held military exercises with China and even sells them weapons! They even tried to hide this fact from the United States. What utter hypocrisy!

Granted, Israel is not a member of NATO, but they are a major non-NATO ally of the United States and a major-league recipient of military aid from the USA.
It is not clear why Washington puts up with such Turkish behavior. The Obama administration seems to be unable to call a spade a spade. It refuses to acknowledge that Turkey is a Trojan horse in NATO, and that Ankara undermines American interests in the Middle East and elsewhere.
What kind of question is that? Why does the USA "put up with" Turkey's "behavior", like they're some sort of bratty child, instead of a sovereign nation with a culture much older than our own? Are you, a university professor, so wrapped-up in your little world view that you'd expect Turkey to just make enemies with everyone that Israel is enemies with, regardless of the Real World consequences?

In case anyone missed the irony: calling Turkey a Trojan horse? Seriously, Efraim? You know that the troops inside the Trojan horse were Greeks, right?

Okay, I think maybe the professor was intending to refer to the Turks as a Fifth Column in NATO. Some sort of hidden threat to come spilling out when we least expect it, I guess. He doesn't say what's supposedly hidden inside the Turkish Horse.

So, Professor Inbar's problems with Turkey is that it hasn't always been blood enemies with countries Israel doesn't like (e.g. Syria and Iran) and that it didn't jump on the bandwagon for the Iraq War to topple a dictator Israel didn't like (i.e. Saddam Hussein), plus, they're trying to make friends with China and Russia, which I guess Professor Inbar sees as a bad thing.

Now, I totally understand that Professor Inbar is an Israeli and is a self-declared Zionist, so for him Israel is all that matters. He wants Israel to be safe and he thinks that everyone in the world should want the same thing. Fine. I get it.

But, Professor Inbar seems to forget that not every country in the world is going to put Israel's wants and needs above their own. Most won't and Turkey is one of those countries that will not. They've got their own problems, their own goals and as long as Israel doesn't get in the way, I'm certain that things will work out.

I'm guessing that Professor Inbar's biggest problem with Turkey is their soft-handed approach with Iran. Sure, Israel - or, at least, Professor Inbar - might enjoy the sight of Tehran being bombed out of existence, but I think that Turkey is onto something here. You know, it's a lot easier to talk to people when you're not trying to starve them out or threatening them with nuclear annihilation.

I wonder how Professor Inbar felt about Israel's monetary enticement they offered to the Jews of Iran to emigrate and also how he reacted when the Iranian Jews told the Israelis that they were insulted at the attempted bribe.

Did it hurt much to be rejected like that? Kind of like getting stood-up at your senior prom, wasn't it?

Turkey's approach to international diplomacy - trying to make friends with as many other countries as you can - is certainly better than trying to make everyone afraid of you. On the domestic side, the AKP is even building bridges with Turkey's Christian minorities. I'd be happier if they'd do the same with their Jewish citizens, but things take time.

I hope that I've stated my objections to Professor Efraim Inbar's article well enough.


Duane Browning
.

Saturday, November 29, 2014

ExposingJohns.com Is A Scam

UPDATE FOR 23 AUGUST 2015

The site exposingjohns.com is down. It is impossible to know if this is permanent or temporary. If you've  already read my blog on this topic, the site went offline for a period of time in the past, only to reappear again soon afterwards.

According to exposingjohns.com's registration information, the site's registration expires on 15 April 2020, so that may not be the reason.

However, I also learned that someone had posted a job offer on Hackers List for a takedown of the site on 27 July 2015.

UPDATE FOR 7 June 2015

Much of what was written in this entry is out-of-date. The situation with ExposingJohns.com and the people associated with it has evolved to such a degree that I would have to rewrite this entire blog to remove the outdated material and incorporate the new stuff.

Rather than go through all that and make an even bigger mess of this entry than it already is, I have written a new post, which you can visit here

Current Status

I haven't noticed new profiles being added to the site in awhile, simply judging by the first page. However, the best way to measure whether the site's listings is growing, shrinking or staying the same is to determine how many pages of profiles there are on any given day. From what I have seen, there are ten profiles per page on the site, with the exception of the last one, which has eight.

As of 28 March 2015, there were a total of 16,447 pages on the site.
Estimate of total profiles listed: 164,468

As of 8 August 2015, there are 16,439 pages on the site
Estimate of total profiles listed: 164,391

Why no new profiles have been added isn't something I know or currently have any way of learning. It does appear that ten profiles have been removed from the site in the past couple of months/ Most of the profiles in the older pages didn't have names or pictures on them and these appear to be the types of profiles removed. This makes sense, since these profiles didn't offer ExposingJohns any sort of leverage against their intended victims.
*************************************

I found this website https://www.exposingjohns.com/ quite by accident. It immediately reminded me of another site I blogged about in the past, which has already been deleted.

Like PotentialProstitutes, the site claims to be doing a Public Good by publicly exposing men who have allegedly solicited prostitutes via text message. I guess you could call this "john-shaming", which is a lot like "slut-shaming". The site shows pictures of the accused - apparently from their Facebook profiles - along with their phone numbers, the city where they live and the type of prostitute they solicited, such as female or transgender. People can post these accusations to the site for free and they don't get paid for these submissions.

Here's what they say about themselves:
What we actually do 
Our operations are clean and professional
ExposingJohns is an online organization, which investigates, identifies, and publicizes the conduct of adults who solicit prostitutes for sex online. The site consists of Third party volunteers who carry out sting operations by posing as prostitutes on sites known for being used to prostitute.
As far as their justification for doing this, they make this statement:
Q: Why are ExposingJohns.com users doing this? Don't we have a right to privacy? 
A: Everyone; including wives, girlfriends, boyfriends, family members, co-workers, current employers and neighbors have the right to know what's going on online and in their neighborhoods. Just like any other illegal activity of concern that is exposed. ExposingJohns.com is no different than a complaint board that exposes the information of those who abuse the trust of the public. There are very serious issues arising such as the spread of STDs to the innocent, child exploitation and human trafficking. In our day and age, this is all now exacerbated by the easy sale of sex online. Since it is so easy to commit such crimes online it is our user's job to make it easy to be exposed.
So, these self-appointed Guardians of the Internet receive their information from people who post ads on websites used by pimps and prostitutes to advertise themselves. These "volunteers" post ads, posing as escorts and forward to ExposingJohns the phone numbers of the respondents, along with screenshots of the text they received.

Once the phone number has been received by ExposingJohns, they can do a Facebook search. Entering the phone number in the Facebook search bar will reveal the owner's name, along with their city of residence and - most damaging - pictures of themselves. The only way ExposingJohns could even get those pictures is if the phone number is linked to a Facebook account.

My understanding is that ExposingJohns then sends a text message to the accused individual, telling them that they have been listed. This person can then visit the link to see their personal information put on the Internet for anyone to see if they do a Google search for their phone number.

There have been reports that the phone number that the texts are apparently sent from is 832-478-7053 and the text reads as follows:
My name is David from Exposing Johns, An online organization that investigates,identifies,and publicize the conduct of adults who solicit prostitutes for sex online. Your name and phone number were reported by prostitutes and female escorts you had solicited for so we hereby pressing charges and you might appear before a judge to defend these charges.Please reply if you want all these charges dropped.
I attempted to call the number from a payphone to see if anyone would answer. No one did and text messages sent to that number were rejected. The number may have been disconnected.

So, while ExposingJohns claims on their FAQ that they don't accept money to remove ads, someone has been sending out text messages demanding money from people they are accusing of having solicited prostitutes.

For a while, ExposingJohns had ads on their site for a company called InternetReputation.com which, for a fee, would remove the ads from ExposingJohns or, at least, suppress the ability of people to find your ad.

Recently, I visited ExposingJohns again and noticed that no ads appear for InternetReputation.com anymore. I have edited this blog from its previous version to reflect this. As of 14 May 2015, InternetReputation.com does not have any connection to ExposingJohns,

Moving on.

Some people might think "So, what? Some guy tries to solicit a hooker and it turned-out to be a fake ad. Nobody got hurt." It's not that simple. Some of the alleged "johns" appear to be either married or have girlfriends, some also appear to be business owners. Even a false accusation can have serious repercussions for these men.

ExposingJohns doesn't spell-out how they determine if a report is fake or genuine. For all they know, someone could Photoshop an image and send it to them, claiming that it's a text message they got from some john. Even assuming that most of the profiles are of men who really did solicit prostitutes, the apparent lack of safeguards to prevent false accusations puts the reliability of the entire site into question.

Furthermore, under their own Terms and Conditions, ExposingJohns states the following:
"You may not upload or transmit any material that infringes or misappropriates any person's copyright, patent, trademark, or trade secret, or disclose via the the Website any information the disclosure of which would constitute a violation of any confidentiality obligations you may have."
What makes this statement hypocritical is the fact that the profile photos of the alleged johns obviously come from Facebook profiles, as far as I could tell. Under the law, the copyright of any photograph is held by the photographer by default. By reproducing, without permission, the photographs of these people, taken from their Facebook profiles, ExposingJohns could have violated copyright law thousands of times over the course of its existence.

ExposingJohns Getting Greedy


NOTE: ExposingJohns ceased offering this method for removing a profile. I decided to keep this section for reference.

Despite the claim posted on their FAQ that they don't accept money to remove profiles, they recently (as of 26 December 2014) added a link for "johns" to remove their profiles. Now, when you view any profile, you will see this 
If you click on the button, this is what you will see

One time fee of $99.97
Premium 24 hour investigation into the claims. The profile in question will be removed from the live site immediately during the 24 hour investigation. We will contact the person who has posted the profile for the following information; full contact information (including proof of personal address), physical proof of solicitation, and all supporting evidence, such as documents or Witness Statements.

If the requested information is not supplied in full after 24 hours the profile in question will be removed and blocked from future posting.

Selecting this "Premium Package" will take you to this 
 

Of course, this means that you will have to trust ExposingJohns not to do anything bad will the credit/debit card information that you'll be giving to them. Since these people are in a foreign country and beyond the reach of US law enforcement, they could just as easily take your money, leave your profile up anyway and sell your information on the Black Market.

The Supposed "Evidence"

Here are three texts that ExposingJohns claims were sent by three separate men in an attempt to solicit prostitutes via the Internet. I have blacked-out the phone numbers, but nothing else was altered.

Look very carefully at the three text messages. Do you notice anything odd about them?

Did you notice that the battery charge is the same in each of them, all of them showing the receiving phone to have a battery charge of 71%. I did a cursory look through other profiles and it was always the same when the receiving phone was a Sprint phone, which always seemed to have the same signal strength, by the way.

Isn't that an odd coincidence of how the battery has somehow maintained the same charge, no matter when the text had been received? I wish my cellphone battery could hold a charge like that, don't you?


The same thing seems to apply no matter what kind of phone is receiving the text. Notice how the receiving phone seems to have the same battery charge when each of these messages was received, regardless of how much time has passed.

It's almost as if they have a template that they use to create fake text message screenshots. isn't it?

What I think is going-on - at least some of the time, maybe all the time - is that the people running ExposingJohns get some guy's phone number (it doesn't matter how) and they do a Facebook search for the phone number where they get his name and other information. They then create a fake text message, accuse him of sending it and send him a text to tell him that his profile is on their site.

You see, you don't even have to do anything to get listed on ExposingJohns. All that has to happen is they get your phone number, find your Facebook profile and copy some of your pictures. Then, they create a profile and send the unwitting victim an accusatory text message. ExposingJohns hopes that you'll be so scared of your friends, family, coworkers, etc seeing it that you'll pay them  to take it down.

If you've received an accusatory text from ExposingJohns, I'd appreciate it if you'd post a screenshot of the message you received in the comments below.

I have no idea how much, if anything, InternetReputation paid ExposingJohns to place its ad on their website. While InternetReputation seems to be an otherwise legitimate company, its relationship with ExposingJohns would gives me enough suspicion to avoid doing business with them, even though that relationship seems to have ended.

Okay. Moving on.

The website exposingjohns.com isn't registered in the United States, but in India.
Name: NETINDIA NETINDIA
Organization: Net4India
Address: D-25Sec-3
City: Noida
State: UP
Postal Code: 201301
Country: IN
Phone: +91.1204323500
Fax: +91.120432350
Email: email@net4.in

They also have a Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/net4.in
and a Twitter account https://twitter.com/net4in
a Google+ page https://plus.google.com/106417143243841714691/posts
and a LinkedIn account https://www.linkedin.com/company/net4-india-ltd

If your personal information has been posted on ExposingJohns and you've already been in contact with  them you might be wondering if you're faced with two rather unappealing choices:
1) pay the money they are asking for in order to remove the profile ; or
2) leave it up and pray that no one you know sees it.

You actually have other options:

  1. change your phone number. It seems obvious, but changing your phone number is a pretty good idea. Doing so removes one level of credibility from the accusing profile. If anyone asks you about it, tell them that telemarketers are harassing you, an ex-girlfriend is stalking you, etc. Make shit up, but try to keep it believable. Personally, I'd blame it on telemarketers. Fuck those guys!
  2. If they posted pictures of you online, they likely got them from your Facebook profile. Deleting your profile would help. If you don't want to go that far, set your profile to Private. It's because your profile is Public that they got your pictures in the first place;
  3. ignore it, since the "proof" they display is no kind of proof at all.


But, wait! There's more!

ExposingJohns, like any website, needs servers to stay on the Internet. As mentioned in the WHOIS, even though the site is registered in India, their servers are in other countries. For awhile, their servers were in the United States, but they have been moved to Singapore. A company called Cloudflare operates reverse proxies for them. Attempts to get Cloudflare to cut them off were unsuccessful.

A reader contacted Cloudflare about ExposingJohns' activities and informed me of the results of their message to the server:
CloudFlare received your abuse report regarding:exposingjohns.com
Please be aware CloudFlare is a network provider offering a reverse proxy, pass-through security service. We are not a hosting provider. CloudFlare does not control the content of our customers.
Accepted URL(s) on www.exposingjohns.com: https://www.exposingjohns.com/
    Hosting Provider: Pallada-For-Dedicated-Servers
    Abuse Contact: abuse@pw-service.com    PR13126-RIPE

We have notified our customer of your report, and we have forwarded your report on to the responsible hosting provider. You may also direct your report to:
1. The provider where exposingjohns.com is hosted (provided above);2. The owner listed in the WHOIS record for exposingjohns.com and/or;3. The contact listed on the exposingjohns.com site.
Note: A lookup of the IP for a CloudFlare customer website will show CloudFlare IPs because we are a pass-through network. The actual website is still hosted at the hosting provider indicated above. If the hosting provider has any questions, please have the hosting provider contact us directly regarding this site. Due to attempted abuse of our complaint reporting process, we will only provide the IP of exposingjohns.com to the responsible hosting provider if they contact us directly at abusereply@cloudflare.com.
Regards,
CloudFlare Abuse
So, it seems that I was mistaken in thinking that ExposingJohns would only have had a single server in the USA. Instead, they are using Cloudflare as a reverse proxy in this country. This keeps their real IP a secret and also provides them with protection from DOS and DDOS attacks.

Very smart. I also discovered that this isn't the first time that Cloudflare has been affiliated with questionable websites or online activities.

The main server seems to be Pallada Web Service, which is located in Russia and is outside the jurisdiction of US law enforcement.

Pallada Web Service has reportedly never responded to inquiries about its connection to ExposingJohns.com, so don't count on them to do anything about it. However, they do have a Facebook page, if you want to try to contact them that way. Posting something there does put it out in the open for others to see. But, it's a good bet that they'll delete your post.

In the same vein, if you want to contact ExposingJohns.com, they posted their email address pm their contact page. In order to thwart attempts by spammers to harvest their email address, they posted it as support(@)exposingjohns(.)com which is rather ironic, when you think about it. Not being inclined to be supportive of their efforts to protect themselves, here's their email address support@exposingjohns.com and I hope you have better luck than others.

I did discover a listing from the Florida Better Business Bureau for ExposingJohns.com, which gave them an "F" rating. ExposingJohns has numerous complaints filed against it in Florida. The given address on the BBB profile is 6815 Biscayne Blvd. Ste. 103 394, Miami, FL 33138 which is likely to be a virtual office and mail sent there is likely to be either returned or ignored.

You can file a complaint with the US Federal Trade Commission against ExposingJohns, as Brian Bates has advised and this seems to be the best bet. Just go to this link.

Another body to which you can complain is the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), which is a joint operation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime Center. Just go to http://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx to file your complaint.

Since ExposingJohns is registered in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, you can also try reporting them to the Noida Police. If you live in the USA, I have no idea how much attention the Noida Police will give to your complaint, but it doesn't hurt to try. Reports can be filed at this link and you can also send an email to cybercrimecell@noidapolice.com and wait for a response.\\


For several days, ExposingJohns was offline, but could still be found at an obscure IP address. They were located at http://37.0.123.249/ and the site can still be seen at this link.

This is the IP address they are using for their former address. Here is the WHOIS for this address

IP Information for 37.0.123.249
Quick Stats
IP Location Russian Federation Russian Federation Moscow Pallada Web Service Llc
ASN Russian Federation AS198310 PALLADA-AS Pallada Web Service LLC,RU (registered Dec 09, 2011)
Whois Server whois.ripe.net
IP Address 37.0.123.249
% Abuse contact for '37.0.123.0 - 37.0.123.255' is ''

inetnum:        37.0.123.0 - 37.0.123.255
netname:        Pallada-For-Dedicated-Servers
descr:          Pallada-infrastructure
country:        RU
remarks:        INFRA-AW
admin-c:        BBER-RIPE
tech-c:         BBER-RIPE
status:         ASSIGNED PA
mnt-by:         Pallada-MNT
org:            ORG-PWSL1-RIPE
changed:      b.kazakov@rt-center.ru   20140328
source:         RIPE

organisation:   ORG-PWSL1-RIPE
org-name:       Pallada Web Service LLC
org-type:       LIR
address:        Pallada Web Service LLC.
address:        Boris Kazakov
address:        8 build.7 Yaroslavskaya street
address:        129164
address:        Moscow
address:        RUSSIAN FEDERATION
phone:          +79160596714
fax-no:         +74955807165
mnt-ref:        RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
mnt-ref:        Pallada-MNT
mnt-by:         RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
abuse-mailbox:  abuse@pw-service.com 
abuse-c:        PR13126-RIPE
e-mail:         b.kazakov@pw-service.com 
tech-c:         BBER-RIPE
changed:      bitbucket@ripe.net   20140626
source:         RIPE

person:         Bogdan Berkovich
address:        141009, 10 Olympic prospect, Mytishi, Moscow region, Russia
nic-hdl:        BBER-RIPE
mnt-by:         Pallada-MNT
changed:       bb@pw-service.com   20140415
e-mail:         bb@pw-service.com 
abuse-mailbox:  abuse@pw-service.com 
phone:          +7 495 580 7165
source:         RIPE

route:          37.0.123.0/24
descr:          PWS-Network
origin:         AS198310
mnt-by:         Pallada-MNT
changed:       b.kazakov@rt-center.ru  20140407

source:         RIPE

The email address b.kazakov@rt-center.ru is linked to phishing attacks and  you can find more information here. Proceed at your own risk.

The website RT-Center.ru appears to be a telecommunications company in Russia. The website is registered to a private individual. Strangely, their website is offline, which is odd for a telecommunications company.

Removing Your Own Name

While you can't force ExposingJohns to take down your profile, you can take steps to remove it from search results, if someone uses that search engine to search for you by entering your phone number.

Remove from Google Search.
Remove from Yahoo Search. Click "Online Safety" under Topics.
Remove from Bing Search.

As I said above: If you don't use your Facebook page very often - or ever - just delete it. Changing your phone number would also be a good idea.


Duane Browning

Sunday, October 26, 2014

Scammer Posing As FBI Agent

On October 14th, I received the following message that went straight to my Spam box:

From: AGENT ERICK BOLT erickbolt@ic.fbi.gov

RE: FROM THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI)

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Field Intelligence Groups 
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 
Washington, D.C.
Attention: Beneficiary,
We sincerely apologized for sending you this sensitive information via e-mail instead of a certified mail, post-mail, phone or face to face conversation, it's due to the urgency and importance of the security information of our citizenry, i am Special Agent Erick Bolt from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Field Intelligence Groups (FIGs). We intercepted two consignment boxes at JFK Airport, New York. The boxes were scanned and they contained large sum of money ($4.1 million) and also some backup documents which bears your name as the Beneficiary/Receiver of the money. Investigation was carried out on the diplomat that accompanied the boxes into the United States and he said that he was to deliver the fund to your residence as overdue payment owed to you by the Federal Republic of Nigeria through the security company in United Kingdom.
After cross-checking all legal documents in the boxes, we found out that your consignment was lacking an important document and we can't release the boxes to the diplomat until the document is found, we have no other option than to confiscate your consignment.
According to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) in Title 26 also contain reporting requirement on a Form 8300, Report of Cash Payment Over $10,000 Received in a Trade or Business, money laundering activity may violate 18 USC §1956, 18 USC 1957, 18 USC 1960, and provision of Title 31, and 26 USC 6050I of the United States Code (USC), this section will discuss only those money laundering and currency violation under the jurisdiction of IRS, your consignment lacks proof of ownership certificate from the joint team of IRS and IRC, therefore you need to reply back immediately for direction on how to procure this certificate to enable us relieved the charge of evading the law on you, which is a punishable offense in the United States.
You are required to reply back within 72hours or you will be prosecuted in a court of law for money laundering, also you are instructed to desist from further contact with any bank(s) or person(s) in Nigeria or the United Kingdom or any part of the world regarding your payment because your consignment has been confiscated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation here in the United States.
Yours In Service,
Special Agent Erick Bolt
Regional Deputy Director
Field Intelligence Groups (FIGs)

While the English in the message is of better quality than typical scammers (Yes, it is a scam) the language isn't entirely as good as one might expect from a college-educated FBI agent that you would expect. I could go into detail, but I don't want to provide any information to any scammer or potential scammer on how to improve their game.

So, I'll stick with easier stuff which provides no help to scammers, but may set any other recipients' minds at ease who might actually be worried that the FBI is coming to get them.

While the fbi.gov email address looks authentic, it is not a valid email address, so any replies sent to it will be bounced-back. The actual Reply address attached to this email is erickfbibolt@gmail.com and no FBI agent would use a separate email address to conduct official business. According to official FBI policy. all official correspondence must be conducted using an FBI-approved email address. The Bureau is still hurting from past agents who have decided to do their own thing at the expense of the US Government.

Another reason to not take this email and its accompanying threats seriously is that the FBI would never contact you by email regarding an official investigation. They would normally come to you in person. A couple of agents would come to your home or workplace, show their IDs and ask you some questions. If the matter was important enough, they would take you to their office and question you there. They would never rely on email to contact you.

Furthermore, notice how "Agent Bolt" provided no phone number for me to call him. So, this whole exchange would have been conducted via email? No, the FBI doesn't work that way. If this email had come from the FBI, I would have been given a phone and/or FAX number.

So, there's no consignment waiting for me anywhere and no FBI agent who's coming to get me. I'm not the first person to receive this email and I don't think I'll be the last.


Duane Browning

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Fighting Identity Theft

Years ago, I realized that I had a problem.

Like most people, I had store receipts, bank statements, etc that had important, personal information about myself that could do me real harm if they ever got into the hands of someone who wanted to steal my identity. Rather than take my chances or try to destroy them by tearing them up or even burning them, I bought a paper shredder. Going through that mountain of papers that I no longer needed, but couldn't allow to get into the wrong hands, took awhile.

At the end of that first Big Shred, I felt an enormous peace of mind. In addition to the important stuff, I also shredded newspapers and junk mail, in order to better frustrate all but the most hardworking identity thief. Anything paper went into the shredder. So far, my efforts seem to have paid-off.

With many pieces of mail I receive (e.g. utility bills, bank statements) I also receive envelopes in which to mail replies or payments. I save these to put store receipts in, to better mix them up in the Pile of shredded paper.

I've gone through three paper shredders over the years. I typically buy the type made for offices, which are made for shredding large amounts of paper into hard-to-reassemble fragments. A somewhat costly initial investment (between $50 to $60) that has given me years of nearly guaranteed assurance that there's no one out there taking out a credit card in my name due to some slip-up on my part.

I've even learned how to keep my shredder blades clean in order to prolong the life of my shredder. After unplugging the device, I open it up to reveal the blades and manually pick out the stuck pieces. I save empty cereal boxes and - after reattaching the top portion of the shredder and plugging it back in - run them through the shredder to get out any remaining fragments stuck in the blades. I do this a few times until the blades look clean.

People might ask me what the odds really are that someone would try to steal my identity. My answer would be that my odds are no better or worse than anyone else's and if past victims of identity theft had taken the steps that I have, they might not have been victimized in the first place.

So, if you're willing to invest the time, effort and money:
1) go buy yourself a good, office-quality paper shredder. The best kind are the ones that cut the paper into tiny, diamond shaped pieces;
2) collect all papers you have that contain information you don't want to get into the wrong hands (e.g. store receipts, credit card statements, credit card applications, bank statements, etc) that you really don't need to hang onto;
3) collect a certain amount of extra unimportant papers (e.g. junk mail, newspapers, election year mailings) to shred and mix in with the important stuff;
4) gather a good number of envelopes that came with the mail. You'll put the store receipts in these. Put in as many as can fit that will still allow the shredder to cut properly. You can simply close the envelope with scotch tape, so you don't get that disgusting taste in your mouth;
5) start shredding. If you don't have a lot to start with, you don't need to worry so much. Just get it done. But, if you're like me and had a lot to start, just take your time. Take a break once in awhile, to allow the machine to cool off. Empty the bin if it gets full. I usually prefer to use a 30 gallon trash bag to put it all in. Shred important stuff and unimportant stuff at the same time to allow the papers to mix in the bin;
6) once you're done, you can throw in a few more things to discourage anyone from going through your pile, such as water, old milk or used cooking oil to help the ink on the paper run or dissolve the fragments better. Toss in some household trash, if you like.

You may be wondering if this is all worth it. Would a potential identity thief go through all this trouble? Enduring the smell of your rotting garbage, trying to reassemble your shredded papers, etc?

Well, the really hardcore type would either do it themselves or have some lackey do it. If you're a home owner, an elderly person with good credit, a business owner, an 18 to 24 year old that puts too much information about themselves on the Internet or anyone else that an identity thief think they'll be able to get some good credit cards by impersonating, then: Yes, they would.

After the initial shred, hold onto those return envelopes you get in the mail, if you're not going to use them, and keep them to put store receipts in that you don't need to keep. At the end of the day or once a week, put the receipts into one of these envelopes and shred them. Shred any pieces of mail you get that you don't need for later. Don't let the paper pile-up and you won't again have a big pile to shred later or be tempted to simply throw them away.

I'll grant that this is a very basic, even amateurish approach. Computer hackers can steal your passwords simply hacking into your computer, your smartphone, credit card company or bank databases. But, these things are outside your control and we're forced to rely on computer professionals to try to prevent this sort of thing from happening.

But, the papers you have are under your control and you can take this step to try to put some of your own effort into protecting yourself.


Duane Browning

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Spam Caller

I received a phone call from 213-784-2616 late yesterday afternoon. I answered and said "hello" repeatedly, but the other party didn't reply and simply disconnected.

Doing a simple Google search informed me that this number is associated with spam and other harassing calls.

The caller seems to be calling people in Hawaii these days. He reportedly sometimes asks for a woman by name and the names vary.

Even calling Directory Assistance gave me no more information than I already possessed.

It appears to be a landline, registered in Los Angeles, CA and is either a cellphone or unlisted.

Since my new iPhone (I switched from an Android) has a Block Caller feature, I availed myself of it.

Hopefully, I won't be bothered by this asshole again.


Duane Browning

Sunday, September 21, 2014

So, You Want to Quit Facebook?

In all the time I've been on Facebook, I've heard people complaining about it and either threatening to quit or announcing that they were quitting. In fact, a lot of people have either reduced their participation in the social networking site or have even left entirely.

If you're thinking about quitting, but you still want to be part of a social networking site, you've got a Big Question looming in front of you: Where will you go?

For some people, leaving Facebook simply means increasing their participation on Twitter. It's a very popular site with lots of members. You can share pictures and videos, but all of your posts are limited to 140 characters, unless you use a third party site like Twitlonger.

But, let's suppose that you want something like Facebook that isn't Facebook. What then?

I'd say that you're shit out of luck. Really.

In years past, sites like Myspace dominated the Internet for places to meet-up with your friends and relatives. But, Myspace had some serious drawbacks and when Facebook came around, people abandoned Myspace like a sinking ship, which is essentially what it was until Justin Timberlake bought it. Even with Mr Timberlake's involvement, I honestly can't say if anyone I know is even a member anymore. Sure, they may have opened an account out of curiosity, but that's a far cry from being an active daily user. I have an account there, but I haven't been active in a long time. It's mostly geared towards music and performance art, so it's not really a good substitute for Facebook.

When Google announced the launch of Google+, people seemed to be scrambling to sign-up. Hearts were beating with excitement, wondering if the Megalodon of the Internet (i.e. Google) could build a better social networking site than Mark Zuckerberg. Given the big G's past failures (e.g. Google Buzz and Orkut spring to mind) people with memories weren't anticipating that things would be different. Still, it seemed at least possible that Google could have learned from past mistakes and done a better job this time around.

In fairness, Google+ is better than FB in some ways, not so good in others. While I don't see much in the way of people sharing pictures of their cats or that morning's breakfast, I have to admit that there is a healthy bit of discussion when people comment on news articles. Google+ does seem to be the grownups' version of Facebook. However, most of the people I know on Facebook either don't have a G+ account or have one but don't use it. So, don't count on your high school classmates finding you there.

China and Russia have their own social networking sites and they seem to have a lot of participation. China, which blocks FB entirely, has WeChat, TenCent Weibo and Sina Weibo, while Russia has VKontakte (also known simply as VK) and Odnoklassniki, however Facebook has made serious inroads there.

I found it rather difficult to sign-up for the Chinese services, since I don't live in China and can't read Mandarin. VK is very easy to join, but Odnoklassniki seems to only allow people in Russia or former Soviet countries to sign-up.

VK looks just like Facebook and I suspect that to be deliberate on the part of the site's owners. It functions well and you could virtually clone your Facebook page in VK and barely notice a difference. However, it is a Russian site, so unless you can read the language or have Google Translate in your browser, you'll spend a lot of time online with no one to talk to. Russia's social networking scene is becoming reminiscent of the Soviet Era, as both VK and Odnoklassniki are owned by the same people and those people have strong ties to the Putin administration.

So, nothing's perfect in an imperfect world, right?

Other social networking sites I looked at are popular only in one or two non-English-speaking countries and really didn't have much to offer. Still other sites looked like they're geared toward finding romantic partners and charge money for full membership.

As I said, you're shit out of luck.

For all its obvious flaws and the seemingly rapturous joy with which Facebook decides at random opportunities to be a bunch of dicks to their members, FB is the most popular social network in the fucking world right now. That is just a fact.

In all fairness, unless you like seeing pictures of your friends' pets and reading their daily or even hourly posts about how bad a day they're having, I'd say that you should just make yourself at home on Twitter. Some days, all I do is check my Twitter feed and totally ignore Facebook.

But, let's say that you want a Facebook substitute and you want all the bells & whistles. Let's make this easier and say you go to VK and copy all the stuff from your FB profile and put it on your VK profile. Okay, you're all set.

The big hurdle - and it is a BIG one - is to get your friends, relatives and/or coworkers to go with you, even to just set-up an account there.

Chances are that they won't. At all.

Even though people have pissed and moaned about Facebook over the years, they are still the #1 game in town, far out in front of even the Chinese networks with their (literally) captive audiences. For the handful of people who quit FB every year, those people are like individual grains of sand on a very big beach and Zuckerberg et al don't worry about them!

But, if you really, really, really want to quit Facebook, go ahead and join VKontakte. Invite all your friends and whatever. Find people on Twitter about quitting Facebook and invite them too. Give it your best shot, buddy. You may like VK better. Who knows?

If you want, at least, one friend on VK, you can friend me. I'll be like what's-his-name on Myspace for you.


Duane Browning